People

@article{gupta2026first,

title = {First-See-Then-Design: A Multi-Stakeholder View for Optimal Performance-Fairness Trade-Offs},

author = {Kavya Gupta and Nektarios Kalampalikis and Christoph Heitz and Isabel Valera},

url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14035},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-01-01},

urldate = {2026-01-01},

journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.14035},

abstract = {Fairness in algorithmic decision-making is often defined in the predictive space, where predictive performance - used as a proxy for decision-maker (DM) utility - is traded off against prediction-based fairness notions, such as demographic parity or equality of opportunity. This perspective, however, ignores how predictions translate into decisions and ultimately into utilities and welfare for both DM and decision subjects (DS), as well as their allocation across social-salient groups.

In this paper, we propose a multi-stakeholder framework for fair algorithmic decision-making grounded in welfare economics and distributive justice, explicitly modeling the utilities of both the DM and DS, and defining fairness via a social planner's utility that captures inequalities in DS utilities across groups under different justice-based fairness notions (e.g., Egalitarian, Rawlsian). We formulate fair decision-making as a post-hoc multi-objective optimization problem, characterizing the achievable performance-fairness trade-offs in the two-dimensional utility space of DM utility and the social planner's utility, under different decision policy classes (deterministic vs. stochastic, shared vs. group-specific). Using the proposed framework, we then identify conditions (in terms of the stakeholders' utilities) under which stochastic policies are more optimal than deterministic ones, and empirically demonstrate that simple stochastic policies can yield superior performance-fairness trade-offs by leveraging outcome uncertainty. Overall, we advocate a shift from prediction-centric fairness to a transparent, justice-based, multi-stakeholder approach that supports the collaborative design of decision-making policies.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{DBLP:journals/corr/abs-2506-05014,

title = {Towards Reasonable Concept Bottleneck Models},

author = {Nektarios Kalampalikis and Kavya Gupta and Georgi Vitanov and Isabel Valera},

url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.05014},

doi = {10.48550/ARXIV.2506.05014},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-01-01},

urldate = {2025-01-01},

journal = {CoRR},

volume = {abs/2506.05014},

abstract = {In this paper, we propose textbf{C}oncept textbf{REA}soning textbf{M}odels (CREAM), a novel family of Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) that: (i) explicitly encodes concept-concept ({texttt{C-C}}) and concept-task ({texttt{C$rightarrow$Y}}) relationships to enforce a desired model reasoning; and (ii) use a regularized side-channel to achieve competitive task performance, while keeping high concept importance. Specifically, CREAM architecturally embeds (bi)directed concept-concept, and concept to task relationships specified by a human expert, while severing undesired information flows (e.g., to handle mutually exclusive concepts). Moreover, CREAM integrates a black-box side-channel that is regularized to encourage task predictions to be grounded in the relevant concepts, thereby utilizing the side-channel only when necessary to enhance performance. Our experiments show that: (i) CREAM mainly relies on concepts while achieving task performance on par with black-box models; and (ii) the embedded {texttt{C-C}} and {texttt{C$rightarrow$Y}} relationships ease model interventions and mitigate concept leakage.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}